Latvia vs Palau: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Latvia
- Palau
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 23,285 current LCU against 19,532 current LCU in Palau, a difference of 3,753 current LCU.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Palau ahead.
Latvia ranks 178th and Palau ranks 181st of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,334 current LCU | 7,045 current LCU | 5,711 current LCU | Palau |
| 2000s | 6,050 current LCU | 9,020 current LCU | 2,970 current LCU | Palau |
| 2010s | 11,841 current LCU | 14,087 current LCU | 2,247 current LCU | Palau |
| 2020s | 19,631 current LCU | 15,840 current LCU | 3,791 current LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Latvia or Palau?
- Latvia, at 23,285 current LCU against 19,532 current LCU in Palau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Latvia and Palau?
- 3,753 current LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Palau?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Palau rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Latvia ranks 178th and Palau ranks 181st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.