Kyrgyzstan vs Monaco: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Monaco
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 269,150 current LCU against 266,082 current LCU in Monaco, a difference of 3,068 current LCU.
Across all 38 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Monaco ranks 85th of 212 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 8.07 current LCU | 61,076 current LCU | 61,068 current LCU | Monaco |
| 1990s | 3,641 current LCU | 75,081 current LCU | 71,440 current LCU | Monaco |
| 2000s | 21,946 current LCU | 108,835 current LCU | 86,888 current LCU | Monaco |
| 2010s | 69,627 current LCU | 146,031 current LCU | 76,405 current LCU | Monaco |
| 2020s | 152,545 current LCU | 212,471 current LCU | 59,926 current LCU | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Kyrgyzstan or Monaco?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 269,150 current LCU against 266,082 current LCU in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Kyrgyzstan and Monaco?
- 3,068 current LCU, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Monaco?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Monaco rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Monaco ranks 85th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.