Kyrgyzstan vs Mexico: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mexico
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 269,150 current LCU against 267,194 current LCU in Mexico, a difference of 1,956 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Mexico ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Mexico ranks 84th of 212 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 8.07 current LCU | 4,830 current LCU | 4,822 current LCU | Mexico |
| 1990s | 3,641 current LCU | 29,480 current LCU | 25,839 current LCU | Mexico |
| 2000s | 21,946 current LCU | 93,122 current LCU | 71,175 current LCU | Mexico |
| 2010s | 69,627 current LCU | 159,668 current LCU | 90,041 current LCU | Mexico |
| 2020s | 171,979 current LCU | 232,913 current LCU | 60,934 current LCU | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Kyrgyzstan or Mexico?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 269,150 current LCU against 267,194 current LCU in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
- 1,956 current LCU, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mexico rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd and Mexico ranks 84th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.