Kenya vs Kyrgyzstan: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Kenya
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 305,524 current LCU against 269,150 current LCU in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 36,374 current LCU.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 81st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 212 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7,003 current LCU | 8.07 current LCU | 6,995 current LCU | Kenya |
| 1990s | 18,770 current LCU | 3,641 current LCU | 15,129 current LCU | Kenya |
| 2000s | 45,688 current LCU | 21,946 current LCU | 23,742 current LCU | Kenya |
| 2010s | 140,326 current LCU | 69,627 current LCU | 70,699 current LCU | Kenya |
| 2020s | 257,446 current LCU | 171,979 current LCU | 85,467 current LCU | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Kenya or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kenya, at 305,524 current LCU against 269,150 current LCU in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Kenya and Kyrgyzstan?
- 36,374 current LCU, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Kyrgyzstan?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Kenya ranks 81st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 83rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.