Israel vs Nepal: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Israel
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 209,327 current LCU against 208,276 current LCU in Israel, a difference of 1,051 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Nepal ahead.
Israel ranks 94th and Nepal ranks 93rd of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4754 current LCU | 499.64 current LCU | 499.16 current LCU | Nepal |
| 1970s | 4.09 current LCU | 1,031 current LCU | 1,027 current LCU | Nepal |
| 1980s | 8,021 current LCU | 2,754 current LCU | 5,267 current LCU | Israel |
| 1990s | 54,212 current LCU | 9,612 current LCU | 44,601 current LCU | Israel |
| 2000s | 96,994 current LCU | 23,187 current LCU | 73,806 current LCU | Israel |
| 2010s | 138,081 current LCU | 86,473 current LCU | 51,608 current LCU | Israel |
| 2020s | 184,489 current LCU | 172,288 current LCU | 12,202 current LCU | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Israel or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 209,327 current LCU against 208,276 current LCU in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Israel and Nepal?
- 1,051 current LCU, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Nepal?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Nepal rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Israel ranks 94th and Nepal ranks 93rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.