Guatemala vs San Marino: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Guatemala
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 55,371 current LCU against 50,675 current LCU in Guatemala, a difference of 4,696 current LCU.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 27 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 139th and San Marino ranks 136th of 212 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,971 current LCU | 36,206 current LCU | 25,236 current LCU | San Marino |
| 2000s | 15,986 current LCU | 46,780 current LCU | 30,794 current LCU | San Marino |
| 2010s | 28,851 current LCU | 39,798 current LCU | 10,947 current LCU | San Marino |
| 2020s | 39,786 current LCU | 47,899 current LCU | 8,113 current LCU | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Guatemala or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 55,371 current LCU against 50,675 current LCU in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Guatemala and San Marino?
- 4,696 current LCU, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and San Marino?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and San Marino rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 139th and San Marino ranks 136th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.