Estonia vs Grenada: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Estonia
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 32,689 current LCU against 30,458 current LCU in Estonia, a difference of 2,231 current LCU.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 169th and Grenada ranks 167th of 213 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,854 current LCU | 9,247 current LCU | 7,393 current LCU | Grenada |
| 2000s | 8,238 current LCU | 16,060 current LCU | 7,821 current LCU | Grenada |
| 2010s | 16,014 current LCU | 22,835 current LCU | 6,821 current LCU | Grenada |
| 2020s | 26,497 current LCU | 28,847 current LCU | 2,350 current LCU | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Estonia or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 32,689 current LCU against 30,458 current LCU in Estonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Estonia and Grenada?
- 2,231 current LCU, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Grenada?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Grenada rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Estonia ranks 169th and Grenada ranks 167th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.