Eritrea vs Marshall Islands: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 10,588 current LCU against 8,489 current LCU in Marshall Islands, a difference of 2,099 current LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Eritrea ranks 198th and Marshall Islands ranks 201st of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Marshall Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,937 current LCU | 2,231 current LCU | 293.98 current LCU | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 5,973 current LCU | 2,636 current LCU | 3,337 current LCU | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 9,443 current LCU | 3,207 current LCU | 6,236 current LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Eritrea or Marshall Islands?
- Eritrea, at 10,588 current LCU against 8,489 current LCU in Marshall Islands as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Eritrea and Marshall Islands?
- 2,099 current LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Marshall Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Marshall Islands rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 198th and Marshall Islands ranks 201st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.