El Salvador vs Kosovo: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- El Salvador
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 6,991 current LCU against 5,767 current LCU in El Salvador, a difference of 1,224 current LCU.
That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 207th and Kosovo ranks 205th of 214 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Kosovo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,947 current LCU | 1,988 current LCU | 958.65 current LCU | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 3,733 current LCU | 3,095 current LCU | 637.95 current LCU | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 5,051 current LCU | 5,417 current LCU | 366.82 current LCU | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, El Salvador or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 6,991 current LCU against 5,767 current LCU in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between El Salvador and Kosovo?
- 1,224 current LCU, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kosovo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Kosovo rank globally for gdp per capita?
- El Salvador ranks 207th and Kosovo ranks 205th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.