Czechia vs Mali: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Czechia
- Mali
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 785,942 current LCU against 694,401 current LCU in Mali, a difference of 91,541 current LCU.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Czechia ranks 55th and Mali ranks 57th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 146,130 current LCU | 153,070 current LCU | 6,940 current LCU | Mali |
| 2000s | 314,152 current LCU | 287,919 current LCU | 26,233 current LCU | Czechia |
| 2010s | 443,474 current LCU | 486,756 current LCU | 43,282 current LCU | Mali |
| 2020s | 672,623 current LCU | 619,548 current LCU | 53,074 current LCU | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Czechia or Mali?
- Czechia, at 785,942 current LCU against 694,401 current LCU in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Czechia and Mali?
- 91,541 current LCU, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Mali?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Mali rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Czechia ranks 55th and Mali ranks 57th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.