Cuba vs Zimbabwe: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 98,794 current LCU against 96,071 current LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,723 current LCU.
Across all 55 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 213 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1,057 current LCU | 0.2412 current LCU | 1,057 current LCU | Cuba |
| 1980s | 1,892 current LCU | 0.3422 current LCU | 1,891 current LCU | Cuba |
| 1990s | 2,033 current LCU | 0.2747 current LCU | 2,033 current LCU | Cuba |
| 2000s | 3,974 current LCU | 0.199 current LCU | 3,974 current LCU | Cuba |
| 2010s | 7,484 current LCU | 1.56 current LCU | 7,482 current LCU | Cuba |
| 2020s | 57,982 current LCU | 10,843 current LCU | 47,139 current LCU | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Cuba, at 98,794 current LCU against 96,071 current LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 2,723 current LCU, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Cuba ranks 113th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.