Croatia vs Georgia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Croatia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 26,576 current LCU against 23,986 current LCU in Croatia, a difference of 2,590 current LCU.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 175th and Georgia ranks 173rd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,509 current LCU | 516.76 current LCU | 1,993 current LCU | Croatia |
| 2000s | 8,176 current LCU | 3,029 current LCU | 5,146 current LCU | Croatia |
| 2010s | 11,470 current LCU | 9,236 current LCU | 2,234 current LCU | Croatia |
| 2020s | 18,710 current LCU | 20,353 current LCU | 1,643 current LCU | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Croatia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 26,576 current LCU against 23,986 current LCU in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Croatia and Georgia?
- 2,590 current LCU, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Georgia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Georgia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Croatia ranks 175th and Georgia ranks 173rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.