Bhutan vs Greenland: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 403,041 current LCU against 391,584 current LCU in Bhutan, a difference of 11,457 current LCU.
Across all 54 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 76th and Greenland ranks 75th of 212 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1,880 current LCU | 25,122 current LCU | 23,242 current LCU | Greenland |
| 1980s | 4,362 current LCU | 83,331 current LCU | 78,969 current LCU | Greenland |
| 1990s | 17,103 current LCU | 121,816 current LCU | 104,713 current LCU | Greenland |
| 2000s | 58,931 current LCU | 193,917 current LCU | 134,986 current LCU | Greenland |
| 2010s | 182,891 current LCU | 297,792 current LCU | 114,901 current LCU | Greenland |
| 2020s | 277,156 current LCU | 380,206 current LCU | 103,050 current LCU | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Bhutan or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 403,041 current LCU against 391,584 current LCU in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Bhutan and Greenland?
- 11,457 current LCU, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Greenland?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Greenland rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 76th and Greenland ranks 75th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.