Barbados vs San Marino: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Barbados
- San Marino
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 56,730 current LCU against 55,371 current LCU in San Marino, a difference of 1,359 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was San Marino ahead.
Barbados ranks 133rd and San Marino ranks 136th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and San Marino in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,119 current LCU | 36,206 current LCU | 15,088 current LCU | San Marino |
| 2000s | 28,193 current LCU | 46,780 current LCU | 18,587 current LCU | San Marino |
| 2010s | 41,082 current LCU | 39,798 current LCU | 1,284 current LCU | Barbados |
| 2020s | 45,121 current LCU | 47,899 current LCU | 2,778 current LCU | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Barbados or San Marino?
- Barbados, at 56,730 current LCU against 55,371 current LCU in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Barbados and San Marino?
- 1,359 current LCU, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and San Marino?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and San Marino rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Barbados ranks 133rd and San Marino ranks 136th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.