Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Azerbaijan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 12,598 current LCU against 12,449 current LCU in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 149 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 196th and Papua New Guinea ranks 197th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 199.46 current LCU | 1,239 current LCU | 1,039 current LCU | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 1,944 current LCU | 2,846 current LCU | 901.66 current LCU | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 6,382 current LCU | 6,766 current LCU | 383.98 current LCU | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 11,120 current LCU | 10,465 current LCU | 654.66 current LCU | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Azerbaijan or Papua New Guinea?
- Azerbaijan, at 12,598 current LCU against 12,449 current LCU in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 149 current LCU, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Azerbaijan ranks 196th and Papua New Guinea ranks 197th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.