Azerbaijan vs Fiji: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Azerbaijan
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 15,270 current LCU against 12,598 current LCU in Azerbaijan, a difference of 2,672 current LCU.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.2 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Fiji ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 195th and Fiji ranks 192nd of 212 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 199.46 current LCU | 3,415 current LCU | 3,215 current LCU | Fiji |
| 2000s | 1,944 current LCU | 5,391 current LCU | 3,446 current LCU | Fiji |
| 2010s | 6,382 current LCU | 9,951 current LCU | 3,569 current LCU | Fiji |
| 2020s | 11,120 current LCU | 12,419 current LCU | 1,299 current LCU | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Azerbaijan or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 15,270 current LCU against 12,598 current LCU in Azerbaijan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Azerbaijan and Fiji?
- 2,672 current LCU, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Fiji?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Fiji rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Azerbaijan ranks 195th and Fiji ranks 192nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.