Armenia vs Uganda: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Armenia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 4.43 million current LCU against 3.67 million current LCU in Armenia, a difference of 768,120 current LCU.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uganda ahead.
Armenia ranks 27th and Uganda ranks 24th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 127,382 current LCU | 228,223 current LCU | 100,842 current LCU | Uganda |
| 2000s | 698,168 current LCU | 653,372 current LCU | 44,796 current LCU | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1.64 million current LCU | 2.37 million current LCU | 736,374 current LCU | Uganda |
| 2020s | 2.92 million current LCU | 3.68 million current LCU | 756,853 current LCU | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Armenia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 4.43 million current LCU against 3.67 million current LCU in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Armenia and Uganda?
- 768,120 current LCU, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uganda?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Uganda rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Armenia ranks 27th and Uganda ranks 24th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.