Armenia vs Syria: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Armenia
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 3.96 million current LCU against 3.67 million current LCU in Armenia, a difference of 296,610 current LCU.
That makes Syria's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Syria ahead.
Armenia ranks 27th and Syria ranks 25th of 212 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 127,382 current LCU | 37,257 current LCU | 90,125 current LCU | Armenia |
| 2000s | 698,168 current LCU | 79,130 current LCU | 619,038 current LCU | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1.64 million current LCU | 277,499 current LCU | 1.36 million current LCU | Armenia |
| 2020s | 2.44 million current LCU | 2.29 million current LCU | 146,582 current LCU | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Armenia or Syria?
- Syria, at 3.96 million current LCU against 3.67 million current LCU in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Armenia and Syria?
- 296,610 current LCU, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Syria?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Syria rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Armenia ranks 27th and Syria ranks 25th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.