Romania vs Turkey: GDP per capita (constant LCU)
GDP per capita (constant LCU) over time
- Romania
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 28,196 constant LCU against 26,717 constant LCU in Romania, a difference of 1,479 constant LCU.
That makes Turkey's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 149th and Turkey ranks 147th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and Turkey in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,507 constant LCU | 10,019 constant LCU | 511.82 constant LCU | Turkey |
| 2000s | 13,405 constant LCU | 12,880 constant LCU | 524.99 constant LCU | Romania |
| 2010s | 19,385 constant LCU | 19,001 constant LCU | 384.29 constant LCU | Romania |
| 2020s | 25,460 constant LCU | 25,591 constant LCU | 131 constant LCU | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Romania or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 28,196 constant LCU against 26,717 constant LCU in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Romania and Turkey?
- 1,479 constant LCU, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Turkey?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Romania and Turkey rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Romania ranks 149th and Turkey ranks 147th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.