Niger vs North Macedonia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Niger
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Niger currently reports 360,861 constant LCU against 289,034 constant LCU in North Macedonia, a difference of 71,827 constant LCU.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Niger ranks 64th and North Macedonia ranks 65th of 213 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 253,679 constant LCU | 129,474 constant LCU | 124,206 constant LCU | Niger |
| 2000s | 242,337 constant LCU | 155,334 constant LCU | 87,003 constant LCU | Niger |
| 2010s | 283,936 constant LCU | 217,764 constant LCU | 66,172 constant LCU | Niger |
| 2020s | 333,090 constant LCU | 266,235 constant LCU | 66,855 constant LCU | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Niger or North Macedonia?
- Niger, at 360,861 constant LCU against 289,034 constant LCU in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Niger and North Macedonia?
- 71,827 constant LCU, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and North Macedonia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Niger and North Macedonia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Niger ranks 64th and North Macedonia ranks 65th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.