New Zealand vs Poland: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- New Zealand
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 70,515 constant LCU against 67,519 constant LCU in New Zealand, a difference of 2,996 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 104th and Poland ranks 102nd of 215 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44,709 constant LCU | 21,379 constant LCU | 23,329 constant LCU | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 55,744 constant LCU | 32,760 constant LCU | 22,984 constant LCU | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 62,346 constant LCU | 47,712 constant LCU | 14,634 constant LCU | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 67,782 constant LCU | 64,634 constant LCU | 3,148 constant LCU | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, New Zealand or Poland?
- Poland, at 70,515 constant LCU against 67,519 constant LCU in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between New Zealand and Poland?
- 2,996 constant LCU, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Poland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Poland rank globally for gdp per capita?
- New Zealand ranks 104th and Poland ranks 102nd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.