Myanmar vs Serbia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Myanmar
- Serbia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 1.38 million constant LCU against 1.13 million constant LCU in Serbia, a difference of 241,110 constant LCU.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Serbia ahead.
Myanmar ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 31st of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 286,034 constant LCU | 431,495 constant LCU | 145,460 constant LCU | Serbia |
| 2000s | 625,448 constant LCU | 601,913 constant LCU | 23,535 constant LCU | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 1.38 million constant LCU | 774,815 constant LCU | 605,125 constant LCU | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 1.44 million constant LCU | 1.03 million constant LCU | 412,628 constant LCU | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Myanmar or Serbia?
- Myanmar, at 1.38 million constant LCU against 1.13 million constant LCU in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Myanmar and Serbia?
- 241,110 constant LCU, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Myanmar and Serbia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Myanmar ranks 30th and Serbia ranks 31st of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.