Moldova vs United States: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Moldova
- United States
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 75,624 constant LCU against 73,574 constant LCU in United States, a difference of 2,050 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 98th and United States ranks 99th of 213 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37,451 constant LCU | 45,465 constant LCU | 8,015 constant LCU | United States |
| 2000s | 34,151 constant LCU | 55,593 constant LCU | 21,442 constant LCU | United States |
| 2010s | 52,424 constant LCU | 61,073 constant LCU | 8,649 constant LCU | United States |
| 2020s | 69,377 constant LCU | 69,919 constant LCU | 542.45 constant LCU | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Moldova or United States?
- Moldova, at 75,624 constant LCU against 73,574 constant LCU in United States as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Moldova and United States?
- 2,050 constant LCU, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and United States?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and United States rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Moldova ranks 98th and United States ranks 99th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.