Lithuania vs Panama: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Panama
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 20,263 constant LCU against 18,541 constant LCU in Panama, a difference of 1,722 constant LCU.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 162nd and Panama ranks 165th of 214 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,194 constant LCU | 6,058 constant LCU | 135.76 constant LCU | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 9,513 constant LCU | 8,564 constant LCU | 948.52 constant LCU | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 14,453 constant LCU | 14,345 constant LCU | 108.6 constant LCU | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 19,243 constant LCU | 16,598 constant LCU | 2,645 constant LCU | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Lithuania or Panama?
- Lithuania, at 20,263 constant LCU against 18,541 constant LCU in Panama as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Lithuania and Panama?
- 1,722 constant LCU, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Panama?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Panama rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 162nd and Panama ranks 165th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.