Latvia vs Saint Martin (French Part): GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Latvia
- Saint Martin (French Part)
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17,433 constant LCU against 17,045 constant LCU in Saint Martin (French Part), a difference of 388 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Saint Martin (French Part) ahead.
Latvia ranks 171st and Saint Martin (French Part) ranks 172nd of 215 countries.
Saint Martin (French Part) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Saint Martin (French Part) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14,564 constant LCU | 15,672 constant LCU | 1,108 constant LCU | Saint Martin (French Part) |
| 2020s | 15,981 constant LCU | 16,180 constant LCU | 199 constant LCU | Saint Martin (French Part) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Latvia or Saint Martin (French Part)?
- Latvia, at 17,433 constant LCU against 17,045 constant LCU in Saint Martin (French Part) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Latvia and Saint Martin (French Part)?
- 388 constant LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Martin (French Part)?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Saint Martin (French Part) rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Latvia ranks 171st and Saint Martin (French Part) ranks 172nd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.