Latvia vs Palau: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Latvia
- Palau
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17,433 constant LCU against 15,852 constant LCU in Palau, a difference of 1,581 constant LCU.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Palau ahead.
Latvia ranks 170th and Palau ranks 173rd of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,622 constant LCU | 13,387 constant LCU | 7,765 constant LCU | Palau |
| 2000s | 9,838 constant LCU | 13,642 constant LCU | 3,804 constant LCU | Palau |
| 2010s | 13,469 constant LCU | 15,102 constant LCU | 1,633 constant LCU | Palau |
| 2020s | 16,665 constant LCU | 14,186 constant LCU | 2,479 constant LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Latvia or Palau?
- Latvia, at 17,433 constant LCU against 15,852 constant LCU in Palau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Latvia and Palau?
- 1,581 constant LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Palau?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Palau rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Latvia ranks 170th and Palau ranks 173rd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.