Finland vs San Marino: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Finland
- San Marino
How they compare
Finland currently reports 42,989 constant LCU against 41,833 constant LCU in San Marino, a difference of 1,156 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was San Marino ahead.
Finland ranks 122nd and San Marino ranks 124th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,876 constant LCU | 42,141 constant LCU | 9,265 constant LCU | San Marino |
| 2000s | 40,094 constant LCU | 47,760 constant LCU | 7,666 constant LCU | San Marino |
| 2010s | 41,996 constant LCU | 35,817 constant LCU | 6,180 constant LCU | Finland |
| 2020s | 43,451 constant LCU | 38,704 constant LCU | 4,747 constant LCU | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Finland or San Marino?
- Finland, at 42,989 constant LCU against 41,833 constant LCU in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Finland and San Marino?
- 1,156 constant LCU, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and San Marino?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do Finland and San Marino rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Finland ranks 122nd and San Marino ranks 124th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.