Czechia vs Uruguay: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Czechia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 595,194 constant LCU against 572,687 constant LCU in Uruguay, a difference of 22,507 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 47th and Uruguay ranks 48th of 213 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 321,045 constant LCU | 294,721 constant LCU | 26,324 constant LCU | Czechia |
| 2000s | 419,722 constant LCU | 335,983 constant LCU | 83,739 constant LCU | Czechia |
| 2010s | 509,562 constant LCU | 494,634 constant LCU | 14,928 constant LCU | Czechia |
| 2020s | 575,825 constant LCU | 536,546 constant LCU | 39,279 constant LCU | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Czechia or Uruguay?
- Czechia, at 595,194 constant LCU against 572,687 constant LCU in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Czechia and Uruguay?
- 22,507 constant LCU, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uruguay?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Uruguay rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Czechia ranks 47th and Uruguay ranks 48th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.