Congo vs Kazakhstan: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Congo
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 874,892 constant LCU against 745,989 constant LCU in Congo, a difference of 128,903 constant LCU.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 39th and Kazakhstan ranks 36th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 964,099 constant LCU | 290,842 constant LCU | 673,257 constant LCU | Congo |
| 2000s | 929,674 constant LCU | 455,419 constant LCU | 474,255 constant LCU | Congo |
| 2010s | 992,806 constant LCU | 700,761 constant LCU | 292,045 constant LCU | Congo |
| 2020s | 749,466 constant LCU | 797,413 constant LCU | 47,947 constant LCU | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Congo or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 874,892 constant LCU against 745,989 constant LCU in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 128,903 constant LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Congo ranks 39th and Kazakhstan ranks 36th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.