Comoros vs Czechia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Comoros
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 595,194 constant LCU against 545,354 constant LCU in Comoros, a difference of 49,840 constant LCU.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 50th and Czechia ranks 47th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 453,586 constant LCU | 321,045 constant LCU | 132,541 constant LCU | Comoros |
| 2000s | 466,001 constant LCU | 419,722 constant LCU | 46,279 constant LCU | Comoros |
| 2010s | 511,463 constant LCU | 509,562 constant LCU | 1,901 constant LCU | Comoros |
| 2020s | 528,231 constant LCU | 575,825 constant LCU | 47,593 constant LCU | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Comoros or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 595,194 constant LCU against 545,354 constant LCU in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Comoros and Czechia?
- 49,840 constant LCU, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Czechia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Czechia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Comoros ranks 50th and Czechia ranks 47th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.