Cape Verde vs Mauritius: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Cape Verde
- Mauritius
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 466,711 constant LCU against 457,076 constant LCU in Mauritius, a difference of 9,635 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 55th and Mauritius ranks 58th of 213 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 71,061 constant LCU | 106,711 constant LCU | 35,650 constant LCU | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 121,189 constant LCU | 170,179 constant LCU | 48,990 constant LCU | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 252,797 constant LCU | 245,198 constant LCU | 7,599 constant LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 350,384 constant LCU | 354,146 constant LCU | 3,762 constant LCU | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 398,013 constant LCU | 406,120 constant LCU | 8,107 constant LCU | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Cape Verde or Mauritius?
- Cape Verde, at 466,711 constant LCU against 457,076 constant LCU in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Cape Verde and Mauritius?
- 9,635 constant LCU, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mauritius?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Mauritius rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Cape Verde ranks 55th and Mauritius ranks 58th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.