Benin vs Kazakhstan: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Benin
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 874,892 constant LCU against 826,368 constant LCU in Benin, a difference of 48,524 constant LCU.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Benin's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 37th and Kazakhstan ranks 36th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 462,972 constant LCU | 290,842 constant LCU | 172,130 constant LCU | Benin |
| 2000s | 534,397 constant LCU | 455,419 constant LCU | 78,979 constant LCU | Benin |
| 2010s | 592,616 constant LCU | 700,761 constant LCU | 108,145 constant LCU | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 739,772 constant LCU | 797,413 constant LCU | 57,641 constant LCU | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Benin or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 874,892 constant LCU against 826,368 constant LCU in Benin as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Benin and Kazakhstan?
- 48,524 constant LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Kazakhstan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Benin and Kazakhstan rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Benin ranks 37th and Kazakhstan ranks 36th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.