Belarus vs Suriname: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Belarus
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 24,988 constant LCU against 23,470 constant LCU in Belarus, a difference of 1,518 constant LCU.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 155th and Suriname ranks 153rd of 213 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,990 constant LCU | 21,592 constant LCU | 13,603 constant LCU | Suriname |
| 2000s | 12,910 constant LCU | 24,408 constant LCU | 11,498 constant LCU | Suriname |
| 2010s | 20,335 constant LCU | 30,089 constant LCU | 9,754 constant LCU | Suriname |
| 2020s | 22,081 constant LCU | 24,494 constant LCU | 2,413 constant LCU | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Belarus or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 24,988 constant LCU against 23,470 constant LCU in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Belarus and Suriname?
- 1,518 constant LCU, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Suriname?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Suriname rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 155th and Suriname ranks 153rd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.