Belarus vs Honduras: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Belarus
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 23,814 constant LCU against 23,470 constant LCU in Belarus, a difference of 344 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 155th and Honduras ranks 154th of 213 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,990 constant LCU | 8,996 constant LCU | 1,007 constant LCU | Honduras |
| 2000s | 12,910 constant LCU | 17,719 constant LCU | 4,809 constant LCU | Honduras |
| 2010s | 20,335 constant LCU | 20,590 constant LCU | 255.26 constant LCU | Honduras |
| 2020s | 22,081 constant LCU | 22,390 constant LCU | 308.67 constant LCU | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Belarus or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 23,814 constant LCU against 23,470 constant LCU in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Belarus and Honduras?
- 344 constant LCU, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Honduras?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Honduras rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 155th and Honduras ranks 154th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.