Belarus vs Grenada: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Belarus
- Grenada
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 23,470 constant LCU against 22,984 constant LCU in Grenada, a difference of 486 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Grenada ahead.
Belarus ranks 156th and Grenada ranks 157th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,990 constant LCU | 11,686 constant LCU | 3,696 constant LCU | Grenada |
| 2000s | 12,910 constant LCU | 16,388 constant LCU | 3,478 constant LCU | Grenada |
| 2010s | 20,335 constant LCU | 18,731 constant LCU | 1,604 constant LCU | Belarus |
| 2020s | 22,081 constant LCU | 20,818 constant LCU | 1,263 constant LCU | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Belarus or Grenada?
- Belarus, at 23,470 constant LCU against 22,984 constant LCU in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Belarus and Grenada?
- 486 constant LCU, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Grenada?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Grenada rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 156th and Grenada ranks 157th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.