Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Azerbaijan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4,381 constant LCU against 3,312 constant LCU in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1,069 constant LCU.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 204th and Zimbabwe ranks 202nd of 213 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 936.98 constant LCU | 4,862 constant LCU | 3,925 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1,648 constant LCU | 3,533 constant LCU | 1,886 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2,968 constant LCU | 3,896 constant LCU | 928.67 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 3,117 constant LCU | 4,008 constant LCU | 891.01 constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Azerbaijan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4,381 constant LCU against 3,312 constant LCU in Azerbaijan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
- 1,069 constant LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Azerbaijan ranks 204th and Zimbabwe ranks 202nd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.