Armenia vs Uganda: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Armenia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 3.16 million constant LCU against 2.53 million constant LCU in Armenia, a difference of 634,540 constant LCU.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.3 times Armenia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 23rd and Uganda ranks 21st of 213 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 483,856 constant LCU | 1.34 million constant LCU | 852,952 constant LCU | Uganda |
| 2000s | 955,485 constant LCU | 1.90 million constant LCU | 947,469 constant LCU | Uganda |
| 2010s | 1.55 million constant LCU | 2.64 million constant LCU | 1.08 million constant LCU | Uganda |
| 2020s | 2.18 million constant LCU | 2.96 million constant LCU | 779,548 constant LCU | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Armenia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 3.16 million constant LCU against 2.53 million constant LCU in Armenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Armenia and Uganda?
- 634,540 constant LCU, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uganda?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Uganda rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Armenia ranks 23rd and Uganda ranks 21st of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.