Argentina vs Latvia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Argentina
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17,433 constant LCU against 16,118 constant LCU in Argentina, a difference of 1,315 constant LCU.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 172nd and Latvia ranks 170th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,125 constant LCU | 5,622 constant LCU | 6,502 constant LCU | Argentina |
| 2000s | 13,424 constant LCU | 9,838 constant LCU | 3,586 constant LCU | Argentina |
| 2010s | 16,354 constant LCU | 13,469 constant LCU | 2,885 constant LCU | Argentina |
| 2020s | 15,421 constant LCU | 16,665 constant LCU | 1,244 constant LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Argentina or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 17,433 constant LCU against 16,118 constant LCU in Argentina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Argentina and Latvia?
- 1,315 constant LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Latvia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Latvia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Argentina ranks 172nd and Latvia ranks 170th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.