Serbia vs Turkmenistan: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Serbia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 8,804 constant 2015 US$ against 8,605 constant 2015 US$ in Turkmenistan, a difference of 199 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 95th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 212 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,348 constant 2015 US$ | 1,993 constant 2015 US$ | 1,355 constant 2015 US$ | Serbia |
| 2000s | 4,670 constant 2015 US$ | 2,725 constant 2015 US$ | 1,945 constant 2015 US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 6,012 constant 2015 US$ | 5,485 constant 2015 US$ | 526.24 constant 2015 US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 7,962 constant 2015 US$ | 7,746 constant 2015 US$ | 216.58 constant 2015 US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Serbia or Turkmenistan?
- Serbia, at 8,804 constant 2015 US$ against 8,605 constant 2015 US$ in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 199 constant 2015 US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkmenistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Serbia and Turkmenistan rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Serbia ranks 95th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.