Namibia vs Tunisia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Namibia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 4,082 constant 2015 US$ against 4,019 constant 2015 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 63 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 139th and Tunisia ranks 137th of 209 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3,268 constant 2015 US$ | 1,972 constant 2015 US$ | 1,295 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 1990s | 2,981 constant 2015 US$ | 2,385 constant 2015 US$ | 596.25 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 3,558 constant 2015 US$ | 3,302 constant 2015 US$ | 255.87 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 4,468 constant 2015 US$ | 3,994 constant 2015 US$ | 474.79 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 3,921 constant 2015 US$ | 3,949 constant 2015 US$ | 27.74 constant 2015 US$ | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Namibia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 4,082 constant 2015 US$ against 4,019 constant 2015 US$ in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Namibia and Tunisia?
- 63 constant 2015 US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Tunisia?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Tunisia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Namibia ranks 139th and Tunisia ranks 137th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.