Mongolia vs Samoa: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Mongolia
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 5,056 constant 2015 US$ against 4,882 constant 2015 US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 174 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Samoa ahead.
Mongolia ranks 125th and Samoa ranks 122nd of 209 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1,667 constant 2015 US$ | 2,490 constant 2015 US$ | 822.6 constant 2015 US$ | Samoa |
| 1990s | 1,548 constant 2015 US$ | 2,613 constant 2015 US$ | 1,065 constant 2015 US$ | Samoa |
| 2000s | 2,037 constant 2015 US$ | 3,555 constant 2015 US$ | 1,518 constant 2015 US$ | Samoa |
| 2010s | 3,653 constant 2015 US$ | 4,187 constant 2015 US$ | 533.76 constant 2015 US$ | Samoa |
| 2020s | 4,384 constant 2015 US$ | 4,506 constant 2015 US$ | 122.37 constant 2015 US$ | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Mongolia or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 5,056 constant 2015 US$ against 4,882 constant 2015 US$ in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Mongolia and Samoa?
- 174 constant 2015 US$, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Samoa?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Samoa rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Mongolia ranks 125th and Samoa ranks 122nd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.