Moldova vs Namibia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Moldova
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 4,019 constant 2015 US$ against 4,019 constant 2015 US$ in Moldova, a difference of 0 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 139th of 209 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,990 constant 2015 US$ | 2,981 constant 2015 US$ | 991.13 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1,815 constant 2015 US$ | 3,558 constant 2015 US$ | 1,743 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2,786 constant 2015 US$ | 4,468 constant 2015 US$ | 1,683 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 3,687 constant 2015 US$ | 3,921 constant 2015 US$ | 234.66 constant 2015 US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Moldova or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 4,019 constant 2015 US$ against 4,019 constant 2015 US$ in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Moldova and Namibia?
- 0 constant 2015 US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Namibia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Namibia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Moldova ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 139th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.