Mali vs Uganda: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Mali
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 1,021 constant 2015 US$ against 933.8 constant 2015 US$ in Mali, a difference of 87.2 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 193rd and Uganda ranks 191st of 210 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 592.51 constant 2015 US$ | 349.52 constant 2015 US$ | 242.98 constant 2015 US$ | Mali |
| 1990s | 646.59 constant 2015 US$ | 431.14 constant 2015 US$ | 215.45 constant 2015 US$ | Mali |
| 2000s | 779.79 constant 2015 US$ | 613.72 constant 2015 US$ | 166.06 constant 2015 US$ | Mali |
| 2010s | 840.89 constant 2015 US$ | 850.84 constant 2015 US$ | 9.95 constant 2015 US$ | Uganda |
| 2020s | 893.22 constant 2015 US$ | 955.32 constant 2015 US$ | 62.1 constant 2015 US$ | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Mali or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 1,021 constant 2015 US$ against 933.8 constant 2015 US$ in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Mali and Uganda?
- 87.2 constant 2015 US$, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Uganda?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
- How do Mali and Uganda rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Mali ranks 193rd and Uganda ranks 191st of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.