Lithuania vs Uruguay: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 19,763 constant 2015 US$ against 19,374 constant 2015 US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 389 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,041 constant 2015 US$ | 9,971 constant 2015 US$ | 3,930 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 9,278 constant 2015 US$ | 11,367 constant 2015 US$ | 2,089 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 14,096 constant 2015 US$ | 16,734 constant 2015 US$ | 2,638 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 18,768 constant 2015 US$ | 18,152 constant 2015 US$ | 615.98 constant 2015 US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Lithuania or Uruguay?
- Lithuania, at 19,763 constant 2015 US$ against 19,374 constant 2015 US$ in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 389 constant 2015 US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Uruguay rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.