Libya vs Montenegro: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Libya
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 8,780 constant 2015 US$ against 8,634 constant 2015 US$ in Libya, a difference of 146 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 96th of 211 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,884 constant 2015 US$ | 4,460 constant 2015 US$ | 6,424 constant 2015 US$ | Libya |
| 2000s | 11,976 constant 2015 US$ | 5,069 constant 2015 US$ | 6,907 constant 2015 US$ | Libya |
| 2010s | 9,277 constant 2015 US$ | 6,491 constant 2015 US$ | 2,786 constant 2015 US$ | Libya |
| 2020s | 7,466 constant 2015 US$ | 7,820 constant 2015 US$ | 353.99 constant 2015 US$ | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Libya or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 8,780 constant 2015 US$ against 8,634 constant 2015 US$ in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Libya and Montenegro?
- 146 constant 2015 US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Montenegro?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Montenegro rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Libya ranks 97th and Montenegro ranks 96th of 211 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.