Lebanon vs Samoa: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Lebanon
- Samoa
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 5,391 constant 2015 US$ against 5,056 constant 2015 US$ in Samoa, a difference of 335 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 123rd of 210 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3,076 constant 2015 US$ | 2,611 constant 2015 US$ | 464.93 constant 2015 US$ | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 5,138 constant 2015 US$ | 2,613 constant 2015 US$ | 2,525 constant 2015 US$ | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 6,787 constant 2015 US$ | 3,555 constant 2015 US$ | 3,231 constant 2015 US$ | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 8,358 constant 2015 US$ | 4,187 constant 2015 US$ | 4,171 constant 2015 US$ | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 5,910 constant 2015 US$ | 4,396 constant 2015 US$ | 1,514 constant 2015 US$ | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Lebanon or Samoa?
- Lebanon, at 5,391 constant 2015 US$ against 5,056 constant 2015 US$ in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Lebanon and Samoa?
- 335 constant 2015 US$, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Samoa?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Samoa rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Lebanon ranks 122nd and Samoa ranks 123rd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.