Latvia vs Oman: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Latvia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 17,074 constant 2015 US$ against 16,892 constant 2015 US$ in Latvia, a difference of 182 constant 2015 US$.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 70th and Oman ranks 69th of 210 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,448 constant 2015 US$ | 18,101 constant 2015 US$ | 12,653 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
| 2000s | 9,533 constant 2015 US$ | 20,479 constant 2015 US$ | 10,947 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
| 2010s | 13,052 constant 2015 US$ | 19,389 constant 2015 US$ | 6,337 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
| 2020s | 16,148 constant 2015 US$ | 17,851 constant 2015 US$ | 1,702 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Latvia or Oman?
- Oman, at 17,074 constant 2015 US$ against 16,892 constant 2015 US$ in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Latvia and Oman?
- 182 constant 2015 US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Oman?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Oman rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Latvia ranks 70th and Oman ranks 69th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.