Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 12,492 constant 2015 US$ against 12,352 constant 2015 US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 140 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 82nd and Malaysia ranks 83rd of 210 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,153 constant 2015 US$ | 5,419 constant 2015 US$ | 1,266 constant 2015 US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 6,503 constant 2015 US$ | 7,122 constant 2015 US$ | 618.88 constant 2015 US$ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 10,006 constant 2015 US$ | 9,489 constant 2015 US$ | 516.46 constant 2015 US$ | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 11,386 constant 2015 US$ | 11,239 constant 2015 US$ | 146.98 constant 2015 US$ | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Kazakhstan or Malaysia?
- Kazakhstan, at 12,492 constant 2015 US$ against 12,352 constant 2015 US$ in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
- 140 constant 2015 US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malaysia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 82nd and Malaysia ranks 83rd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.