Jordan vs Uzbekistan: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Jordan
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 4,733 constant 2015 US$ against 4,579 constant 2015 US$ in Jordan, a difference of 154 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 131st and Uzbekistan ranks 128th of 210 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4,282 constant 2015 US$ | 1,702 constant 2015 US$ | 2,580 constant 2015 US$ | Jordan |
| 1990s | 3,543 constant 2015 US$ | 1,401 constant 2015 US$ | 2,142 constant 2015 US$ | Jordan |
| 2000s | 4,365 constant 2015 US$ | 1,723 constant 2015 US$ | 2,642 constant 2015 US$ | Jordan |
| 2010s | 4,674 constant 2015 US$ | 3,056 constant 2015 US$ | 1,617 constant 2015 US$ | Jordan |
| 2020s | 4,360 constant 2015 US$ | 4,213 constant 2015 US$ | 146.88 constant 2015 US$ | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Jordan or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 4,733 constant 2015 US$ against 4,579 constant 2015 US$ in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Jordan and Uzbekistan?
- 154 constant 2015 US$, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Uzbekistan?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Uzbekistan rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Jordan ranks 131st and Uzbekistan ranks 128th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.