Hungary vs Latvia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Hungary
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 16,892 constant 2015 US$ against 16,711 constant 2015 US$ in Hungary, a difference of 181 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 70th of 210 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,887 constant 2015 US$ | 5,448 constant 2015 US$ | 2,439 constant 2015 US$ | Hungary |
| 2000s | 10,709 constant 2015 US$ | 9,533 constant 2015 US$ | 1,177 constant 2015 US$ | Hungary |
| 2010s | 12,777 constant 2015 US$ | 13,052 constant 2015 US$ | 274.73 constant 2015 US$ | Latvia |
| 2020s | 16,095 constant 2015 US$ | 16,148 constant 2015 US$ | 53.53 constant 2015 US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Hungary or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 16,892 constant 2015 US$ against 16,711 constant 2015 US$ in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Hungary and Latvia?
- 181 constant 2015 US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Latvia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Latvia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Hungary ranks 71st and Latvia ranks 70th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.